On Saturday Marszalkowska EuroPride parade passed. Without the support of the president of the city, without money from the city and from sponsors. Almost complete absence of the latter is proof of the existence of a displacement of sexual minorities. So no beer brand, any bank or mobile phones do not want to be associated with the parade. Even at the lowest level of evolution of marketing, where advertising products stopped at the stage nabazgranego "promotion" on the plywood (this is a quote from Sylvia Chutnik) you will see the reluctance to EuroPride. With the exception of one person selling wuwuzele a wheelchair, there was no sales of sausages, hot dogs, cotton candy or - what is most acute in trzydziestokilkustopniowym heat when it goes up at noon means Marszalkowska - cold drinks. It is striking, because three months ago, I saw the seller of candles arrived at the Krakow suburb within a few hours after an absolutely unexpected breakdown of the Tupolev. Could it be this time - although there was more time - this is grassroots entrepreneurship spraraliżował fear?
Well, I already know my views on equality parade. Yes, I think the topic is important and legitimate demands of LGBT communities in the name of his views I fried up on a Saturday in the city center. Perhaps I should not move this topic, as well as the subjects did not move the election or grief (at the time of mourning). Because these are such things that everyone already has crystallized his private opinion, which they write all the columnists in all the newspapers, which have not been talking at the table. For what? And so everyone knows her. Only you can end up arguing.
Speaking on private matters is not constructive? Sometimes it is not. Sometimes there is nothing to try to convince their relatives in their arguments, my own opinion is enough - and should - go for the elections to express or at the parade.
And if the parade itself is constructive? After all, is a public statement about the sexual preferences, so very private. I met up with the anti-reaching arguments paradowymi to do just that savoir-vivre'owego beliefs about private matters that do not speak publicly. It was something like, "what do I care that they are gay. And let them be. Do I inform the entire city about your sexual orientation?".
I think that in this case it would be unconstructive niemówienie. There is a difference between nieporuszaniem difficult topics at the family dinner, which lasts two hours and nieporuszaniem difficult subject for life in the name of public peace. In the latter case, better to pull out of the urban area of \u200b\u200bwhat is private. Because only then can go to revise social beliefs about what is in the comfort of home is right and what is not. Although the theme of the parade is privacy, a belief about it are formed on a social level, in the process of socialization, and, therefore, discussed and can be corrected only in the public agora.
begs me to associate with domestic violence. Once people thought that if a parent beats a child, do not get it intrude - it's a private family matter. But thanks to this prawatnej removing the case to the public space, even though the social campaigns, this has changed (to the despair ultraprawicy). So we had to deal with the shift of the border in his private life: beating was once considered something of the order, now is considered bad. Environment LGBTQ, pulling his case to light, they want to achieve a change in the opposite direction: that the homosexual relationship, which is regarded today as bad or worse, at least, began to be perceived as something good.
Well, I already know my views on equality parade. Yes, I think the topic is important and legitimate demands of LGBT communities in the name of his views I fried up on a Saturday in the city center. Perhaps I should not move this topic, as well as the subjects did not move the election or grief (at the time of mourning). Because these are such things that everyone already has crystallized his private opinion, which they write all the columnists in all the newspapers, which have not been talking at the table. For what? And so everyone knows her. Only you can end up arguing.
Speaking on private matters is not constructive? Sometimes it is not. Sometimes there is nothing to try to convince their relatives in their arguments, my own opinion is enough - and should - go for the elections to express or at the parade.
And if the parade itself is constructive? After all, is a public statement about the sexual preferences, so very private. I met up with the anti-reaching arguments paradowymi to do just that savoir-vivre'owego beliefs about private matters that do not speak publicly. It was something like, "what do I care that they are gay. And let them be. Do I inform the entire city about your sexual orientation?".
I think that in this case it would be unconstructive niemówienie. There is a difference between nieporuszaniem difficult topics at the family dinner, which lasts two hours and nieporuszaniem difficult subject for life in the name of public peace. In the latter case, better to pull out of the urban area of \u200b\u200bwhat is private. Because only then can go to revise social beliefs about what is in the comfort of home is right and what is not. Although the theme of the parade is privacy, a belief about it are formed on a social level, in the process of socialization, and, therefore, discussed and can be corrected only in the public agora.
begs me to associate with domestic violence. Once people thought that if a parent beats a child, do not get it intrude - it's a private family matter. But thanks to this prawatnej removing the case to the public space, even though the social campaigns, this has changed (to the despair ultraprawicy). So we had to deal with the shift of the border in his private life: beating was once considered something of the order, now is considered bad. Environment LGBTQ, pulling his case to light, they want to achieve a change in the opposite direction: that the homosexual relationship, which is regarded today as bad or worse, at least, began to be perceived as something good.
0 comments:
Post a Comment