Movies About People With Cf

Left profile in the ear

In Warsaw recently, we have a personalized city cards to be able to navigate the urban communication. The card must provide your name, surname, personal identification number and give you a picture. Well. There is no way out. I ordered a personalized card that whole city for two days receiving.

photo had to show my left ear, be in a 3:4 ratio, without headgear, without dark glasses. I wonder, what in the picture for proof of identity is needed ear. I usually recognize people after ... huh wiem, po twarzy? Praktyka zakrywania oczu - czy to ciemnymi okularami, czy w telewizji pikselami - wskazuje, że tożsamość można rozpoznać po oczach. Ale po uszach? Mnie ucho nic nie mówi. Może kanary, granicznicy i konduktorzy są przeszkoleni do tego, żeby rozróżniać ludzi po uszach? Ciekawe. W każdym razie nigdy jeszcze żaden z nich nie powiedział do mnie: "proszę pokazać lewe ucho".

Wytyczne co do ucha, koloru tła, braku nakrycia błowy i okularów to normalizujące reguły odwzorowania rzeczywistości. Tak myślę. Są po to, żeby nadać fotografii obiektywność - coś jak reguły rysunku technicznego. But why is not among those rules - existing information there to cement the relationship pictures of reality - the principle that a picture can not be retouched?

Best Names For College Groups

So fast time flies ...


time flies so fast and calendar hangs loose ...
I realized that I need to change something in your life, as long as it is not too late ...
partially fulfilled his dream - I finished the course of cutting and sewing!
formed a small studio ...
Even if people adopt a lot of work premises, purchase of equipment, but I'm happy, I know that I'll do what I like ... and I hope that I can make it ... In moments of relaxation
Pysia was very liked it:

Weak Left Channel Mac 4100

photo as art. But modern

About the book Charlotte Cotton, "Photography as contemporary art"

Not that I somehow knew at a very contemporary art, but I like it. Although I have to take part in their requirements.

Art is not going to be pretty, it might be nice, or dress shoes. There is also to be virtuosic, not very much I care about craft artists. It's their business, or communicate their thoughts through relatively easy to learn photography or by using labor-intensive carving. If someone sits for months ryjąc in stone, but carve platitudes, the workload does not make me get a consolation prize. On the contrary, it only make things worse.

Next: art is supposed to be dense in meaning. Wise, to put it simply. But even that's not the point. Art has to react to their environment, an interest in its social context. Do not pretend that it is more than that, because it is not. It could even be a joke, maybe just some parody elements of reality, so long as it was not done by people okrzykiwanych geniuses who apply virtuoso technique and speak on the timeless themes of "sadness", "self portrait" or "my sad self-portrait."

I write about all this, because Charlotte Cotton, author of Photography as contemporary art , goes to the title theme "photography as art" with the idea of \u200b\u200bart was such as mine. This similarity understanding of art amazes me, because - although it is a common understanding of contemporary, just right (and those who this issue are right, agree with me;)) - the sphere of photography is just a niche, which has been preserved anachronistic understanding of art.

According to this anachronistic stereotype images are artistic pictures taken freely, those that are not service providers, neither commercial nor snapping to remember (holiday party, family reunion). Not only is their purpose on Parnassus, but also their subject. Satirically, but clearly described by James Banasiak, "still prefer to think that the art of photography is dim recesses of the picturesque towns of pictures, dry, black and white portraits of wrinkled old men, and a modern variant - the water droplets immobilized by the precision of the best camera. "(James Banasiak What about photography? , introduction to photography I love Adam Mazur).

Charlotte Cotton trick such anachronistic art photography in one sentence on page 11 and more to it does not come back, dealing with the meaning of art photography today.

And art in the modern sense is not a play of ideas (Stieglitz, Cartier Bresson, Doisneau, anyone who can find pictures in the stories of photographic art.) Contemporary art photography refers to the textbook is not canon, but rather to popular culture or the use of amateur photographs.

(Richard Billingham in the series laughing with Ray , hence )

If you apply visual clichés, it does so consciously.

(Mona Hatoum Back Van Gogh, hence )

artistic photography is not about exhibiting art photographer, just for a simple to use photography as a tool for documentation.

(Tatsumi Orimoto The bread man and a mother suffering from Alzheimer's , hence )

Cotton also devotes two chapters to describe the style of contemporary art photography: deadpan a sterile, neutral, large-format images photography, and is tableau narrative pictures, which is often unclear which use (or ambiguity?), and so much opposition to the clarity of meaning, which is characterized by conventional, correct, professional photos.

It's a very brief summary, which does not reflect what kind of book is cool Cotton. Speaking of shortcuts in question, I will tell you about a flaw in this book: This book is a collection of zajawek. Over two hundred photographs reproduced more or less the same number of artists and artists. For every artist - a valid, recognized, with the achievements - there is one picture and akapicik explaining what's going to keep such an artist in his work in general, in the above photograph in detail. The effect is sometimes comical, as in the Monty Python TV show in which participants were told seven volumes In Search of Lost Time in fifteen seconds. But a collection of

zajawek is nothing like a compendium. And that this is for me the book Charlotte Cotton: an excellent compendium of the cool, revealing photos.

Interesting Facts Triple X Syndrome

Menel laugh End

heard a fragment of conversation two meneli: "what, postraszymy the people?". Of course, I was surprised, I began to scoff. I always thought that menel have no sense of humor. I always thought that at most it can have a laugh, for example, by typing in a search engine You Tube'a "Meneli fight" or "lithuanian umbrella."

My story about menelach different from the movies: If you laugh at movies with a sense of superiority, masking anxiety. To interpret such a laugh you can apply what he wrote about laughter Bergson, is fit for comedy, Charlie Chaplin and Jacques Tatiego, but it also fits into filmiku "Lithuanian Umbrella." The source of humor is the mechanical movement of the person who loses control over his body, rolling over, as if it were an object. Blurring the boundary between object and subject of worrying, so we laugh. However, if my laugh stories from the reversal of order: for the better has to be someone who is widely regarded as inferior. We laugh a surprise: menel, from which we expect animal stupidity, they can tell a joke, they are also attentive observers of others' reactions, they also have a sober view of how they are perceived.

source of humor is the same: figure Menel as a fool. Except that the movie serves to improve the well-being at the expense of someone, and my anecdote in the end is a noble moral.

Where Can I Find Paragoric

How to sell flats for sale flats

If you hit on this blog is to say that certainly are interested in selling apartments. Yeah, but how to sell the apartment to all the practice are not turned against us? With the help guide on how to sell comes home. I will be brief, this guide helped me and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in selling the home. With the guide you will learn things that today you are likely to be foreign. All issues will be illuminated which is the sale of flats.